As to the onus of proof, the party alleging joint responsibility for a debt has the onus of proving that the debt was incurred for a family purpose. But in Mallen v. Mallen the court stated that a spouse with the burden of proof will: ... enjoy and assist in the discharge of the burden where there is no evidence and no suggestion that any of the cash-flow found its way into non-family purposes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.