An Office of the Children’s Lawyer (“OCL”) report that provides extensive investigation with first-hand information deserves serious consideration. Conversely, little or no weight will be given if the OCL report is outdated, is biased, uses poor methodology or improper assumptions, contains limited or incorrect evidence, or reaches conclusions that are inconsistent with objective evidence: Maharaj v. Wilfred-Jacob, 2016 ONSC 7925, at para. 67.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.