The point, I think, is one having more to do with the rules of proof and presumptions, and should be decided on the merits of the evidence given. It seems to me that the general trend of the cases on the point does not go further than this, that “the not giving notice indeed raises a strong presumption that the article at the time of the sale corresponded with the warranty and calls for strict proof of breach of warranty”: Poulton v. Lattimore (1829), 9 B. and C, 259, at p. 265.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.