Another four days of hearings were held in May 2005 to determine the quantum of damages having regard to the principles articulated in the 2004 damages decision. In December 2005, the motion judge issued a judgment confirming his authority to take judicial notice of "the general acceptance in the financial community of the ability of portfolio managers to shift, within limits, the asset allocations within a portfolio": Authorson Estate v. Canada (Attorney General), [2005] O.J. No. 5582, [2005] O.T.C. 1126 (S.C.J.) ("judicial notice decision"). This was an important finding because without the ability to vary the portfolio from the norms, the resulting damage award would have been substantially lower.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.