With respect to the mobility issue the decision of Gordon v. Goertz, 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27 sets out a non-exhaustive list of factors that must be considered: 1. the existing custody arrangement and relationship between the child and the access parent; 2. the existing access arrangement and the relationship between the child and the access parent; 3. the desirability of maximizing contact between the child and both parents; 4. the views of the child; 5. the custodial parent’s reason for moving, only in the exceptional case where it is relevant to that parent’s ability to meet the needs of the child; 6. the disruption to the child consequent on removal from family, schools, and the community he or she has come to know.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.