In Clifford v. Epsten (1951), 234 P. 2d 687 (District C.A., California), a mobile home used as a temporary office on a trailer court was held not to be a fixture. Mussell J., speaking for the majority, at pp. 689-90 gave the following reasons: “The finding that the trailer was a part of the real property is not supported by substantial evidence. The evidence shows that the trailer in question was a mobile unit similar to the 40 others situated on the premises; that it was not attached to the realty; that water and electrical connections, consisting of hose and tubing, were detachable in two minutes; that there was no permanent plumbing; that a sign reading ‘office’ was attached to a post in the ground near the trailer; that the trailer was used temporarily as an office and home for the manager; that a permanent building regularly used for an office up to September, 1949, had been moved away, leaving an adjacent permanent building adaptable for the same use; that the trailer in question was for sale at all times.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.