The applicant’s second argument is that the Minister failed in several respects to properly consider his rights under s. 6 of the Charter. He says that the Minister wrongly delegated the analysis required by United States of America v. Cotroni, 1989 CanLII 106 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1469 to a prosecutor, that a proper Cotroni analysis could not reasonably yield the conclusion that prosecution would be more effective in the United States, and that he should have been provided with disclosure of the full basis for the Cotroni analysis.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.