In this case, the applicant is mainly relying on Faci v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 FC 693 [Faci] to argue that the Minister's delegate erred in not taking into consideration all of the factors set out in the Manual. However, although there was a discrepancy regarding the scope of the Minister's delegate's discretion, the decision relied on by the applicant to argue that the Minister erred by not considering all of the factors set out in the Manual specifically stated the opposite of what the applicant maintains:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.