Is a positive medical opinion as to causation essential to a finding of causation?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Barker v. Montfort Hospital, 2007 ONCA 282 (CanLII):

My answer to these submissions is that a positive medical opinion as to causation is not essential to a finding on this issue. Considering the cumulative effect of all of the circumstances, including the medical evidence, a trial judge is entitled to draw a common sense inference: Snell v. Farrell, 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311 at para. 44. That is what the trial judge did here and his conclusion is entitled to deference.

Other Questions


When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
When there are two opposing expert opinions in a medical malpractice case, is it appropriate for a motions judge to weigh evidence and make findings of credibility? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a standard medical practice negligent in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a witness who has not been engaged by or on behalf of a party to the litigation give five opinion evidence for the truth of their opinion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a flexible approach to causation in medical negligence cases? (Ontario, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is a plaintiff entitled to access his medical records and charts? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the "robust and pragmatic approach" to fact finding in relation to causation for a rare disease? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a conclusion or opinion from a witness be admitted as non-expert opinion evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on disclosure of medical records in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether causation can be drawn even in the absence of positive or scientific proof? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.