Bearing in mind the definition of undue hardship in the Act, the dictionary definition of "intolerable" and the interpretive principles enunciated in the previously cited cases, I am satisfied that the meaning of the phrase "undue hardship" is clear and therefore it must be applied in that sense. Further, it cannot be interpreted so widely as to detract from the object of the Act, that is the preserving of human dignity: see Bhinder v. C.N.R. (1985), 1985 CanLII 19 (SCC), 7 C.H.R.R. D/3093 at [D/3096] para. 24720 (S.C.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.