The meaning of “hardship” in this context was also examined by Hutchison L.J.S.C., as he then was, in Thonger v. Palmer, [1988] B.C.J. No. 1474 (S.C.), where he said, at p. 4: In my view the section requires particularity of that point since it is always inconvenient to have a lis pendens registered against one's property. The question is in what particular way does that inconvenience the person whose property the lis pendens is registered against. There must be a degree of oppression so that the inconvenience goes further and creates hardship. That is the first hurdle for the petitioner.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.