In an early case, 1792, Timmings v. Timmings, 3 Hagg. Ecc. 76, 162 E.R. 1086, Lord Stowell is reported as saying: True it is that a husband is not barred by a mere permission of opportunity for adultery; nor is it every degree of inattention on his part which will deprive him of relief; but it is one thing to permit and another to invite; he is perfectly, at liberty to let the licentiousness of the wife take full scope.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.