The plaintiff also cited Sinnott v. Boggs, 2007 BCCA 267 at para. 15, in support of the proposition that although the plaintiff is able to work, just at a reduced capacity, he is still entitled to some amount reflecting this lost capacity: The line between non-pecuniary damages and damages for loss of earning capacity is between losses that sound in pain and suffering and non-remunerative amenities on the one hand, and pecuniary loss in the form of reduced ability to earn income on the other. There is no reason why an injury which permits a plaintiff to continue in a particular occupation but at a reduced level of performance and income should not be compensated for that pecuniary loss through damages, for loss of earning capacity.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.