In Corbiere v. Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs), 1999 CanLII 687 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 203, at para. 52, L’Heureux‑Dub J. suggested in obiter that the scope of s. 25 was likely greater than that of s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and may include statutory provisions. She did qualify this statement by noting that the fact that a statute relates to aboriginal people would not, without more, suffice to bring it within the scope of s. 25. In my opinion, the limitations proposed above are consistent with this statement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.