The leading authority which sets out the criteria to be addressed by the proponent of a limitation on a right or freedom guaranteed by the Charter is The Queen v. Oakes, 1986 CanLII 46 (SCC), [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; 65 N.R. 87; 14 O.A.C. 335; 26 D.L.R.(4th) 200; 50 C.R.(3d) 1; 24 C.C.C.(3d) 321. The onus of proof is on the party seeking the limitation and the standard of proof is the civil standard, proof by a preponderance of probabilities. Two requirements must be satisfied to establish that a limit is reasonable and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. First, the legislative objective which the limitation is designed to promote must be of sufficient importance to override a constitutional right. Second, the means chosen to attain those objectives must be proportional or appropriate to the ends. This proportionality requirement, in turn, normally has three aspects: the limiting measures must be carefully designed, or rationally connected to the objective; they must impair the right as little as possible; and their effects must not so severely trench on individual or group rights that the legislative objective, albeit important, is nevertheless outweighed by the abridgment of rights.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.