Similarly, in Law Society of BC v. Hall, 2003 LSBC 11, at para. 2, the panel stated: ... it is essential for lawyers to respond to Law Society communications. Otherwise the Society cannot effectively discharge its responsibility of protecting the public interest in the administration of justice. It is simple: lawyers neither have the freedom not to respond nor the freedom to respond according to a schedule that suits them. They certainly cannot put their heads in the sand, as the Respondent said he did.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.