The law regarding wrongfully obtained evidence in family disputes was thoroughly canvassed in Mathews v. Mathews, 2007 BCSC 1825. At para. 43, Barrow J. succinctly summarized the proper approach to admissibility of such evidence: From the foregoing, it is clear there is a limited discretion to exclude relevant evidence in this context. The judicial exercise of that discretion involves a balancing of competing interests which can be usefully viewed as assessing the probative value of the evidence as against its prejudicial effect. It does not involve the application of the Charter per se.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.