Is there a duty to warn of the dangers of placing a hand between the tongue-guides?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Roy v. Doucet, 2005 NBCA 84 (CanLII):

Moreover, the law is rightly allergic to the imposition of a duty to warn one’s reasonably intelligent “neighbour” (see Donoghue v. Stevenson, 1932 CanLII 536 (FOREP), [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.)) against dangers that are self-evident. There is no evidence that the appellant was anything other than reasonably intelligent, and the slight risk posed by placing a hand between the tongue-guides was obvious.

Other Questions


What is the test for placing a child in the care of a social worker? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of provocation in a sexual assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for deciding whether to adjourn an adjournment? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for establishing necessity in a defence case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the impact of a retroactive award in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for reversing a decision of a trial judge on a motion of appeal against a finding of not guilty? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for whether an accused had no safe avenue of escape? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for a waiver of child support? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the reliability of Mentum Planet’s data analysis for forensic purposes? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does the duty of fairness extend to administrative tribunals? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.