Is there a presumption of resulting trust for a person who voluntarily transfers property into his own name jointly with another person?

18. In situations such as the present when the transferor, without consideration, voluntarily transfers property to himself and another, a presumption of resulting trust arises, which may be rebutted. In Niles v. Lake, 1947 CanLII 5 (SCC), [1947] S.C.R. 291, [1947] 2 D.L.R. 248 at 254-55 it was stated: The law is well settled, I think, that when a person transfers his own money into his own name jointly with that of another person, except in cases with which we are not concerned, then there is prima facie a resulting trust for the transferor. This presumption, of course, is a presumption of law, which is rebuttable by oral or written evidence or other circumstances tending to show there was in fact an intention to give beneficially to the transferee.