What are the legal principles governing the assessment of whether reasons given by a dispute resolution officer are adequate?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hawk v. Nazareth, 2012 BCSC 211 (CanLII):
Another helpful explanation of the legal principles which govern the assessment of whether reasons given by a dispute resolution officer are adequate is provided by Harris J. in Andree v. Bentley, 2011 BCSC 641 [Andree]:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the adequacy of reasons given by a dispute resolution officer pursuant to the RTA? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles applicable when assessing whether gender impacts an earnings loss assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
In assessing the reasonableness of a registrar's assessment, how has the registrar conducted her assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
How to read the reasons of the adjudicator as a whole to assess whether the decision was reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a Residential Tenancy Branch dispute resolution officer be found to have breached their duty to be fair? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether there has been anordinate delay in determining whether a claim has been successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the legal principles applicable to the assessment of loss of future earning capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles governing the resolution of a motion of no confidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles that govern the assessment of future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the applicable legal principles in assessing potential future loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
