If there was ever a case where a purchaser was entitled to reject the goods this is it. On the other hand the law in respect to the rejection of goods is very clear. No particular form of notice of rejection is necessary. The buyer may return the goods or offer to return them and it is sufficient to signify his rejection of them by stating that they are not according to the contract and that they are held at the vendor’s risk. See Grimoldby v. Wells (1875) LR 10 CP 391, at 395, 44 LJCP 203. As far as I can find from the evidence the defendant, although trying desperately to have the stove put in order, did not reject it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.