What is the last time the Supreme Court of Canada has considered a motion in a personal injury case?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Occhipinti v. National Car Rental, 2003 BCPC 314 (CanLII):
The last case was Halliday v. Wigmore, [1996] B.C.J. No. 1536, B.C.S.C., a decision of Mr. Justice Hood. Counsel cited it specifically for a number of paragraphs that each side indicated supported their particular view.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Canada consider a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In making a determinate order on a motion of no confidence in a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case, what are the reasons why such a determination is necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC Supreme Court of Canada granted relief to a mother in her own personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a BC Supreme Court case, in what circumstances will the court consider success versus loss of custody? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the court order that common sense be considered as a factor in determining future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
