It is not in every case that experts will be prepared to offer a scientific opinion on causation. That may be so because science has not reached the stage where anything definitive can be said about the disease that has resulted. In such cases, the absence of such scientific opinion does not necessarily mean that the plaintiff cannot succeed. Where science cannot assist, then a “robust and pragmatic approach” adopted by Justice Sopinka in Snell v. Farrell, supra, may be appropriate.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.