Also, there is insufficient material placed before the court at this time that would reasonably support the assertion that the individual defendants have some form of fiduciary relationship or good faith duty in the circumstances. In Scott v. Trophy Foods Inc., [1995] N.S.J. No. 145 (N.S.C.A.) Hallett J.A. stated at para 63: The LAC Mineral judgment sends a signal to the Courts that they should be slow to impose fiduciary duties on a party every time the court perceives a breach of trust or confidence, particularly where the relationship between the parties is not one of the traditional relationships giving rise of fiduciary duties (i.e. trustees and beneficiaries, etc.) and the relationship is between commercial entities governed by the terms of a contract.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.