That being so, the jury, acting judicially (see McLean v. McCannell, 1937 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1937] S.C.R. 341 at 343), could not reasonably conclude that the respondent, through the tortious act of the appellants, had lost 15 years income earning ability. It was, however, open to the jury to compensate the respondent for the substantial chance, whether one calls it a probability or not, of the loss of five working years of her occupation as a kitchen worker.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.