In our opinion, the trial judge did not act on any wrong principle or misconceive or overlook any evidence when, in exercising his discretion, he directed that the matrimonial home should belong to the wife in its entirety and the remaining one-half quarter to the husband. (See: Schneider v. Schneider (1980), 1979 CanLII 2265 (SK CA), 1 Sask. R. 19, Birkeland v. Birkeland, 1979 CanLII 3446 (SK CA), 10 R.F.L.(2d) 42).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.