The trial judge applied the rule in Browne v. Dunn when considering the evidence regarding the firing of the complainant. He said: Of significance, defence counsel suggested to the complainant in cross-examination that she was told only that she could not work there anymore if she continued to be late. The accused’s version that he fired S.S. was not put to her so that she might address it ….
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.