The real issue is which party is entitled to what costs. As a general overriding principle, it is important to note that as trial judge I have the broad discretion to award costs in any of the alternative manners set out by both counsel; Roach v. Dutra, 2010 BCCA 264. Although this discretion has sometimes been described as "unfettered," it is always to be exercised judicially, that is, according to legal principles. Rule 9-1(6) sets out the factors for the court to consider in assessing the impact of a formal offer to settle on an award of costs. Taking each one of these factors in turn, I find the following:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.