Where the provisions of a contract are inconsistent, an attempt should be made to reconcile them by giving effect to the terms in accordance with the intention of the parties. If it is impossible to reconcile the terms in this way, then the term that is repugnant to the parties’ intention is to be rejected in favour of giving effect to the term that reflects their real intention: BG Checo v. BC Hydro, 1993 CanLII 145 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 12 at 23-24.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.