Finally, I have considered Regina v. L.A.M. (1986), unreported (B.C.C.A.), where in a unanimous judgment a youth charged with a violent senseless murder of another youth was transferred to ordinary court for trial. I am quick to accept and agree with its ruling that s. 16 is to be interpreted as establishing that the interest of society is the paramount interest in a hearing of this nature. However, because the youth in this case had such an evident predisposition for violence, I am not able to say the result of that case is instructive of what should be ordered in this instance where that factor is not so predominant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.