How have courts interpreted the language of the Income Tax Act?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Brick Protection Corporation v. Alberta (Provincial Treasurer), 2011 ABCA 214 (CanLII):
As held by Major J. in Canada v. Friesen at para. 113: The clear language of the Income Tax Act takes precedence over a court’s view of the object and purpose of a provision.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted language in a trust application? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a fire insurance contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the definition of income sufficient to provide a livelihood? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a lack of guilty intent as an excuse for the publishing of an article by a newpaper when the material was prejudicial to the court proceedings? (Alberta, Canada)
