What is the impact of conflicting expert opinions on the standard of care owed by a coach to a referee?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corporation of Manitoba Ltd. et al., 2011 MBQB 225 (CanLII):

In Henderson v. Canadian Hockey Association, 2010 MBQB 20, Simonson J. considered the significance of conflicting expert opinions regarding the standard of care owed by a coach to a referee and whether it had been breached. Referring to the expert opinions, she stated:

Other Questions


What is the standard of care of a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case where there are conflicting opinions between two doctors? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review and what is the impact of this? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the current standard of conduct in a defamation action? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the impact of the sophistication of the individual defendant on the determination of inherent prejudice in a motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeals from support orders? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required to discharge the onus of a gift? (Manitoba, Canada)
What standard of review applies to a question of law, fact and inference? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a breach of the duty of procedural fairness reviewed on a reasonableness standard? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a trial judge's findings of fact and the inferences drawn by her? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the impact of a traumatic history of a 5 year old in temporary care? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.