In Hulowski v. Hulowski [1945] 3 WWR 140 (affirmed on other grounds ibid, p. 753) a similar situation arose. The person who drew the contract for sale or transfer in that case, also took the acknowledgment of the wife, form B under The Homesteads Act; and McNiven, J.A., then a trial judge, found (headnote): “Where a transfer is voidable on the above grounds circumstances may arise or the wife may so conduct herself as to estop her from asserting her rights under the Act *. * *.” Again: “Although a person cannot be estopped from alleging the invalidity of a transaction which is prohibited by statute on grounds of general public policy * * *; the rule is otherwise where the transaction in question is one which must eat the risk of a statutory penalty be performed in a certain way, and the statute affects only a certain class of persons.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.