First, the appellant’s convictions as a party to the offences involved in the home invasions do not, in this case, create a meaningful dissimilarity to his convictions as a principal in the predicate offences. A person may be convicted as a party only where their conduct has extended beyond presence at the scene or passive acquiescence. They must have engaged in encouragement of the principal, or an act which facilitates the commission of the offence, or an act which tends to prevent or hinder interference with accomplishment of the criminal act: Dunlop and Sylvester v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 20 (SCC), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 881, at p. 891.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.