In Philips v. Astling (1809) 2 Taunt 206, 127 ER 1056, the defendants guaranteed acceptance of a bill and, as. I understand the decision, the guarantors were discharged because no demand was made upon the drawer and acceptor of the bill and notice of dishonour was not given to them. I take it that the drawer and acceptor were therefore discharged and that there was no recourse against the guarantors.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.