The general causation test that is applied in this case is the test of “causative significance”. This requires that the employment had to be of causative significance, which means more than a trivial or insignificant aspect of the injury. It is not necessary that the injury be the exclusive or sole cause of the condition (Chima v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2009 BCSC 1574). It is not necessary that the injury be the dominant or most significant cause as expressed in (Schulmeister v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2007 BCSC 1580).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.