Is new evidence submitted as fresh evidence admissible at trial?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Duong, 1995 ABCA 510 (CanLII):

In our view, the material submitted as fresh evidence is not admissible evidence. In any event, it does not meet the tests for the admission of fresh evidence set out in Palmer v. Palmer, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759. In particular the "evidence" is not credible in the sense that it is reasonably capable of belief and, even if believed, it would not, when taken with the other evidence adduced at trial, be expected to have affected the result.

Other Questions


What are a number of cases that support the argument that objection to admissibility of evidence is to be made at the time the evidence is tendered? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for admitting fresh evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
When can a witness give evidence that is not in evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a trial judge to admit fresh evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
What constitutes “non-expert opinion evidence” in identification evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a finder of fact not compelled to discount the evidence of a witness on a point when an opposing witness has not been confronted and challenged with the contrary version of the evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for fresh evidence in the context of an appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for assessing exculpatory evidence in a sexual assault trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Would the admission of the balloons in evidence constitute judicial condonation of unacceptable conduct by the investigatory or prosecutorial agencies? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that the use of evidence that could not have been obtained but for the purposes of the trial was unfair? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.