The first exception applies to cases in which it is possible to reliably determine the standard of care without the assistance of expert evidence. As explained by Southin J.A., at para. 44 of Zink v. Adrian, 2005 BCCA 93, this will be the case only where the court is faced with "non-technical matters or those of which an ordinary person may be expected to have knowledge". …
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.