In any event, I am not persuaded that the applicants have met their burden with respect to the first segment of two-part test as outlined in Withler v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 12 (CanLII). While the applicants have established the effect of breach of their rights related to freedom of religion, in my view, they have not demonstrated a distinction based on an enumerated class of persons or analogous grounds to sustain their argument.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.