I digress here to note that new family obligations assumed by a payor spouse will usually not amount to a material change in circumstance in relation to that spouse's obligation to pay support for his or her natural children. That is, in part, a reflection of the "first family" concept. In Beatty v. Beatty, [1997] B.C.J. No. 995 (C.A.), Southin J.A. expressed reservations about whether the "family first obligation concept" has any place in relation to children of step-parents. There is no doubt, however, that R.A.V.'s primary obligation is to his natural child, and hence the birth of that child amounts to a material change in circumstance.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.