The first allegation of absence of clean hands relates to a suggestion that, during the time when the plaintiff maintains he was diligently advancing a proposal to re-zone a large portion of this parcel of land, he was in receipt of WSIB benefits and not reporting this “work”. I agree with the plaintiff that this scenario, even if proved, falls far short of the egregious circumstances that would entitle the defendants to rely on such a shield: see Taylor v. Guindon, [2005] O.J. No. 3110 (S.C.J.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.