The father submits that the judge erred in treating the mother as the primary residence, or custodial parent, and treating her best interests as synonymous with the child’s. The father relies on the case of Stav v. Stav, 2012 BCCA 154 at para. 59, where it was found that these errors were made by the trial judge.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.