The opposite conclusion was reached by the trial judge in Wells v. Campbell, 2015 BCSC 3. In that case, the husband owned a home before the parties married and transferred that home into joint tenancy with his wife five years before the parties separated. At para. 32 of the decision, the trial judge decided that the home was transferred as a “perfected inter vivos gift” that could not be revoked. He determined that the Family Law Act did not alter the law of inter vivos gifts, so the presumption of advancement still applied.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.