What are the implications of the Rylands v Fletcher doctrine on the doctrine of strict liability?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Grabatin v Harasym, 2013 SKPC 130 (CanLII):
As mentioned, the evidence in these proceedings raises issues related to the Rylands v. Fletcher doctrine of strict liability; negligence; and nuisance.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for liability in the case of Rylands v Fletcher v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for the doctrine of strict liability for the escape of dangerous substances? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant town be held liable under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the rule in Rylands v Fletcher apply? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Minister of Health and Social Care have any basis to strike the Statement of Claim in the context of bad faith allegations in paragraph 5 and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the principle of strict liability apply in the case of property standing off, although adjacent to, a highway? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of “escape” under the principle of Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for pure economic loss under the law under Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principle in Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the elements of a cause of action under the principles in Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
