The effect of s. 65 is that even though a valid agreement is not set aside, its terms regarding division of property can be varied by the court. The courts have held that a properly negotiated agreement is not unfair simply because it produces a different result from the statutory scheme. In other words, a fair division is not necessarily an equal division: Elliott v. Elliott, 2007 BCSC 98.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.