The effect of an “entire agreement” clause (Section 16.2 of the Lease) was discussed in Threshing Machine v. Mitten (1919), 1919 CanLII 527 (SCC), 59 S.C.R. 118, at pp. 119-20: The written contract declares in explicit words that the terms of the agreement between the parties are to be found in the writing and in the writing exclusively. In face of this provision it is not, in my opinion, competent for a court of law to resort to contemporary conversations or prior conversations or even to the legend on the article for the purpose of discovering a contract differing in its terms from that expressed in the ambiguous language of the instrument.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.