However, it is clear from the case law that while the duty to consult is not triggered by historical impact and is not a vehicle to address historical grievances, it may be impossible to understand the seriousness of the impact of the Project on treaty rights without considering the larger context. The cumulative impacts of the Project on treaty rights and historical context may inform the scope of the duty to consult as set out in West Moberly at paras. 117 to 119, and approved of in Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc., 2017 SCC 41 at paras. 41-42.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.