The absence of a party from the courtroom when a request is made for an order affecting his or her rights places a very high duty and burden on the party seeking the order. That duty is to make full and frank disclosure of all material facts – i.e. facts which might make the decision doubtful or might affect the outcome of the motion. The burden on the moving party to make full disclosure is a high one, and rightly so in a court system which operates on principles of openness, transparency and the adversarial presentation of cases. In Sparkle Ventures v. At My Accounting Department[5] I reviewed, at length the meaning and practical application of the obligation on a party to make full and frank disclosure of material facts on an ex parte motion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.