Sections 180 and 181 apply in the case at bar. As well, both the pedestrian and driver owed common law duties: the plaintiff, as a pedestrian had a duty to take reasonable care for her own safety and the defendant, as driver had a duty to exercise due care to avoid a collision with a visible pedestrian. The duties owed by one are not greater than those owed by the other. The question of degrees of fault if these duties are breached can only be resolved based on the evidence as a whole. See Liston v. Striegler, [1996] B.C.J. No. 1408 (C.A.), at para. 14.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.