The question, for the purposes of the present case, would be whether a physician is in a relationship of proximity to the fetus sufficient to support a duty of care, and whether there are policy reasons to negate such a duty: see Cooper v. Hobart, 2001 SCC 79, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537. The analysis requires also that the harm in question be reasonably foreseeable, but foreseeability is conceded here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.